1/1/2024 0 Comments Eidetic imagery ap psychologyexamines the effect of EM on the retrieval of cued negative images acquired through word–image paired association. Although a high rate of EM was associated with significant reduction in emotionality and vividness, contrary to expectation, the rate of EM did not interact with the extent of reported image vividness. report two studies that examine how the speed of eye movement (EM) interacts with the emotionality and vividness of negative memories. Two articles consider the potential limitations of this approach. Over the last decade, there has been a considerable impact in this area of, for example, working memory theory and dual task methodology on procedures associated with reducing intrusive cognitions. ![]() One central theme across the topic is articles that have focused on the role of mental imagery in memories for negative events. This topic provides a unique collection of articles that combine different perspectives from the field of clinical psychology with more diverse perspectives drawn from the wider literature on mental imagery. We are very pleased with the final result, which comprises 15 articles drawn from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, and neuroscience. The current research topic presents a diverse range of cutting-edge papers focusing on investigating the underlying mechanisms and/or treatment interventions associated with mental imagery in clinical disorders. The study of mental imagery has clinical relevance because such imagery has been increasingly shown to play a key role across various psychological disorders (3, 4). Mental imagery refers to the simulation or recreation of perceptual experience across different sensory modalities (1, 2). In addition, MGT represents an alternative to the currently dominant conception of imagery in the philosophical literature namely, as a perceptual or perception-like state of mind. MGT says that instead of facing perplexing heterogeneities here, we instead face a significant unity. Mental imagery helps and harms the human mind to extreme degrees and this is something that calls for elucidation. The second puzzle concerns how to square imagery's architectural promiscuity with its psychopathological relevance that is, imagery's capacity to be a maintaining cause, and possibly even a partial constituent, of several psychological disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. ![]() The first puzzle concerns imagery's architectural promiscuity that is, its ability to interact with diverse psychological faculties and perform very different functions when doing so. MGT is motivated by reflection on converging evidence from clinical, experimental and social psychology and solves at least two conceptual puzzles about mental imagery. Rather, it outlines an important and overlooked higher-order function of mental imagery: that it aids various psychological faculties in discharging their functional roles. This paper introduces a novel thesis about mental imagery namely, that it is grease for the mind's gears (MGT). Ahsen’s theory of eidetic imagery and its ISM model has been proved by the modern literature, in neuropsychological perspective (i.e., Gains et al., 2004 Slotnick et al., 2005 Patel et al., 2007 Ganis & Schendan, 2008 Holmes & Mathews, 2010 Ji et al., 2017) Ahsen (1965, 1968, 1977a, 1984) compiled and extended their work more scientifically and established eidetic imagery as an independent school of psychology with a well-formulated set of principles about the function and structure of the image and the state of consciousness. Reviewing its vividness, sensory and somatic components, many researchers began to study imagery under the name of ‘Eidetic Imagery’, in the realm of psychology. The strong relation between affective-somatic processes and imagery was emphasized. Mental imagery has been used for various therapeutic purposes several approaches to mental imagery were critically analyzed and recommendations were offered for future inquiry. Psychologists studied imagery under the term of ‘Mental Imagery’ and identified its role in learning and memory, and defined it as a process (not as merely a picture) (i.e., Finke, 1989). From Aristotle to Ludwig Wittgenstein, almost all the leading philosophers acknowledged the significance of imagery in one way or other (i.e., Watson, 1913 Aristotle, 1930 Allport, 1924 etc.). Literature reveals that imagery and its significance have been demonstrated by a number of philosophers. ![]() ![]() The study critically analyzed the evolution of eidetic image psychology, from its philosophical background to the scientific neuropsychological evidence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |